Python Interpreters Benchmarks
x64 ArchLinux : Intel® i5-7200U®

 pystone benchmark N=50,000

Each chart bar shows how many times slower, one ↓ pystone program was, compared to the fastest program.

These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programming languages.

Column × shows how many times more each program used compared to the benchmark program that used least.

     sortsortsort
  ×   Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
1.0PyPy 3 0.110.13?2300  14% 0% 8% 85%
1.2Cython 0.130.18?2401  89% 89% 100% 100%
1.3PyPy 2 0.140.352122301  22% 30% 22% 29%
1.6Nuitka 0.180.19?2300  100% 6% 15% 15%
1.9Pyston 0.210.3242301  67% 13% 13% 23%
2.0Python 2 0.230.266042301  4% 4% 0% 96%
2.3Python 3 0.270.271,6642300  100% 17% 8% 8%
2.4Python development version 0.270.281,7682300  15% 25% 7% 100%
3.1MicroPython 0.350.379882300  14% 100% 16% 14%
17Graal 1.891.15457,4482300  35% 34% 26% 79%
76Jython 8.593.623,5162301  48% 65% 68% 73%
103RustPython 11.6811.7018,8202300  8% 4% 5% 100%
missing benchmark programs
IronPython No program
Shedskin No program
Numba No program
Grumpy No program

 pystone benchmark : PyStone benchmark

 

Revised BSD license

  Home   Conclusions   License   Play